You can see that both the Textile and Markdown content is easier to read - and type - than the HTML version. MegaWidget|$25,110|$26,260|$25,210|$28,370|Ĭompared to (sales-2006.html), widget sales were ***really* good** this year, primarily due to the introduction of the MegaWidget (photo below): Next year we plan to introduce more products:Ĭompared to "last year":sales-2006.html, widget sales were *_really_ good* this year, primarily due to the introduction of the MegaWidget (photo below): Here’s an example:Ĭompared to last year, widget sales were really good this year, primarily due to the introduction of the MegaWidget (photo below): The nice thing about these markup languages is that, unlike HTML, you can easily read and make sense of the original markup. There are implementations of Textile and Markdown available in many languages, from JavaScript through to PHP, Python, Ruby, and ASP.NET.įor links to various implementations, see the “Find out more” section at the end of this article. That way the user can easily go back and re-edit their content in Textile or Markup format. It’s also a good idea to store both Textile/Markup and HTML versions of the content in separate fields in your database. The first approach is more efficient, since you don’t have to convert the markup every time the content is displayed. Your CMS can convert the markup to HTML when the user saves their edits, or when the content is viewed. Then, when they save their edits, the content is converted to HTML by your CMS. These languages are known as lightweight markup languages.Įssentially, the user enters their formatted content into your CMS edit form using one of these languages.
Recently, a middle ground has opened up in the form of simple markup languages like Textile and Markdown. Those users don’t want to learn HTML, so what’s an application developer to do? The alternative: Easy-to-use markup languages That said, many people use these editors in their Web applications because users demand an easy way to enter rich content. For example, many WYSIWYG editors will strip out an empty div element if you try to add it yourself! This can make it very hard if you want to insert your own custom HTML. The editors tend to want you to do things their way. This is fine if you prefer the mouse, but there isn’t the range of keyboard shortcuts available to, say, Word users. Typically, you have to format your content by clicking on buttons and using drop-down menus. These editors often weigh in at several hundred kB, which causes a noticeable delay when the page loads. This often means that the style of the content clashes with the style of the site’s templates.
#Markdown web editor free#
People using WYSIWYG editors are usually free to choose their own fonts, colours and images (although it is possible to lock down users’ options to some extent). WYSIWYG editors are better than they used to be, but they still often turn out bloated, semantically confusing HTML, ridden with unnecessary class and style attributes. These editors can be very useful, as they allow people with no knowledge of HTML to insert richly-formatted content - including text, images, and even video - into their blogs and websites.
#Markdown web editor how to#
You can read more about these 2 editors, and find out how to integrate them into your site, in my article Adding a WYSIWYG HTML Editor to Your Site. The most popular WYSIWYG editors are the catchily-named CKEditor and TinyMCE.
I’m talking about the JavaScript-based visual editors that are embedded into blog systems like WordPress and content management systems like Drupal.
You’re probably familiar with WYSIWYG HTML editors. The article ends with lots of useful links to help you find out more about Textile and Markdown. You’ll also compare them to each other, and to using WYSIWYG editors.
#Markdown web editor install#
You’ll learn what they are, how to install them, and how to use them. In this article you’ll learn about 2 popular alternatives to WYSIWYG editors: Textile and Markdown. Great though these editors are, they do have a few drawbacks. In order to allow people to enter richly-formatted text and images, many sites use WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) HTML editors. These days, many websites allow you to enter your own content - whether it’s creating a Web page, writing a blog post, or posting in a forum.
0 kommentar(er)
